Crafting High-Quality Wikipedia Articles: A Guide to Advanced Editing ---WANG YIKE 12.2

Editing Wikipedia might seem straightforward—add facts, fix typos, and move on. But as the video “Understanding Wikipedia: Advanced editing” and the page on Article Development show, creating high-quality content is an art and a process that requires skill, patience, and collaboration.

Beyond Basics: What Makes Quality Content?

The video highlights that quality Wikipedia articles do more than just list facts—they tell a clear, neutral, and well-organized story. High-quality articles are:

  • Well-researched, using reliable secondary sources to provide context and depth.

  • Neutral, presenting all significant viewpoints fairly without bias.

  • Comprehensive, covering the topic’s key aspects without undue emphasis on trivial details.

  • Clear and readable, with a logical structure, good use of headings, and smooth prose.

These principles aren’t just ideals—they’re core policies that guide every experienced editor’s work.

The Article Development Process

According to the Wikipedia page on Article Development, writing a great article usually happens in stages:

  1. Start with a stub: a short article with basic facts.

  2. Expand with sections: add relevant details, history, and context.

  3. Improve sourcing: add citations from reliable sources, replacing unsourced statements.

  4. Refine structure and prose: reorganize for flow, clarity, and readability.

  5. Collaborate and review: invite other editors to suggest improvements, catch errors, or add perspectives.

Wikipedia encourages continuous improvement—no article is ever “finished.” Editors often create “to-do” lists and use talk pages to coordinate their work.

Advanced Tools and Techniques

The video also introduces advanced editing features: templates, infoboxes, citation tools, and formatting tricks that make articles look professional and consistent. Learning to use these tools effectively helps articles meet Wikipedia’s standards and improve user experience.

Collaboration is Key

Both sources emphasize that article development is collaborative. It’s normal for articles to evolve through many editors’ contributions over time. Constructive discussion on talk pages and adherence to consensus-building are vital to creating balanced, trustworthy content.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

LIN AIJIA Extra credit blog

China and Globalization The relationship between China and globalization is one of the most significant themes in 21st-century international politics, economics, and cultural exchange. As the world's second-largest economy and the largest developing country, China plays multiple roles in the globalization process: as a beneficiary, a driver, and a participant in shaping the rules.   Historical Background   Reform and Opening-Up & Globalization   China's adoption of the reform and opening-up policy in 1978 marked the beginning of its full integration into the globalization process. [1]   By introducing foreign investment and joining international economic organizations (such as the World Trade Organization), China gradually transformed from an agriculture-based nation into a global manufacturing hub.   Accession to the WTO   In 2001, China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) [2] , a critical milestone in the globalization process. Through mark...
Read more

The Spirit Behind Wikipedia: Collaboration, Talk, and Trust- WANG YIKE 2.1

In a world overflowing with online information, Wikipedia stands out—not just for its vast range of content, but for how it is created. After watching “Why Wikipedia” and “How to Leave (and Read) a Wikipedia Talk Message,” and reading the introduction materials from Joseph Reagle’s Good Faith Collaboration, I’ve come to see that Wikipedia is more than a website—it’s a community built on trust, transparency, and a shared belief in the value of open knowledge. The “Why Wikipedia” video explains that Wikipedia is driven by a radical idea: anyone can edit. This openness has obvious risks, but surprisingly, it works. Why? Because Wikipedians follow a core principle called “good faith.” The idea is that editors assume others are acting with good intentions. They might disagree or make mistakes, but they are seen as partners in a shared mission, not enemies. This idea of good faith collaboration is explored deeply in Reagle’s writings. In the Foreword, Lawrence Lessig praises Wikipedia as an ...
Read more